Female Werewolves

Post Reply
*Tomekk
Posts: 855
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Posted by *Tomekk »


Can we get female zombies, liches, ghouls, trolls and alike too? :lol: #evilladies

But in all seriousness, gender ambiguos model does look a lot better, since wolves generally don't have breasts and that female model looks very weird for having it. :blink:
*Mick64
Posts: 490
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Posted by *Mick64 »


Well we do have female liches :)

And if we had the models for them, all the rest you mentioned are candidates that could have a female model with breasts (Very saggy for the undead ;) ) if we had one. Different story then werewolves.
*Red the Rogue
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Posted by *Red the Rogue »


http://i.imgur.com/qjknxaj.jpg

I'm not so sure they're that large, especially in comparison to all the female models we have already. I still argue the current male model doesn't look as good as the original female werewolf model when taking into consideration the stance and proportions. Who in their right mind stands with their knees bent this much when idle?http://i.imgur.com/GScJQVv.jpg

Agreed though that realistically, I wouldn't think they'd have such defining features. Though, even the 3.5 Monster Manual seems to depict them that way anyway.http://archive.wizards.com/dnd/images/M ... _PG173.jpg

To be fair, though, I'd rather play my hybrid forms as actually clothed. Due to there not being a model available for that, as well as the difficulty and work to make it so in NWN2, it's either hybrid form and pretend they are dressed, or just RP the change and not actually do it. Heck, I'd even make the suggestion of using the arcanaloth model to do it if I could, but alas.

So my question is, why not leave it up to the player to choose which model they want to use? There is definite interest in using the original female model ('yes', possibly 'don't care'), at least in the first 12 hours of the poll going up. It doesn't seem very lore-breaking either if someone else were to use that model for their PC, and it is a model already in the game.
*Jelkia
Posts: 71
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Posted by *Jelkia »


Sounds like folks er talkin an thinkin bout tha werewoofs like they'd needed ta have evolved inta havin breasts.

But... werewoofs aint really evolved as ah race yeh? Ah know there es some natural woofs like Altair.. but mostly they're folks corrupted by magic an curses. En most cases tha magics makes em ah combination ah woof bits added ta their natural self... both en tha physical an emotional portions.

Hybrid form es jus tha.. ah hybrid ah tha person before bein ah woof.. an then tha woof bits add all en together with who they was before. Why wouldn't et have breasts if et was ah female with breasts ta begin with? O.o

Es yer tits fallin off part ah tha lycan curse now? :lol:
*Sinlinara
Posts: 528
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Posted by *Sinlinara »


Nimiane,Dec 16 2016 wrote:
Mick64,Dec 16 2016 wrote: Most female werewolves I've seen have no visible sexual characteristics, which makes sense to me because wolves don't really have breasts in the same way humans do.
These are my thoughts also. If anything, when one takes into consideration the practical reason behind the taytays, they'd either be non-existant (unless a werewolf would nurse the way way a human woman would) or they'd have like... six teats or something. Having boobs on a werewolf just seems to be sexualizing something that doesn't need to be.
It's true. That's why our Full Wolf Form should never have humungo milk-sacks over their chests.

But Humanoid Women do have breasts (Citation Needed). And the Hybrid Form is an intermediary of those two shapes. It's meant to retain some Humanoid characteristics because it's not a full transformation into a wolf.
*SyntheticRose
Posts: 136
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Posted by *SyntheticRose »


Why is there no vote option for player's choice? Honestly, we have some people who want a more appropriately representative model, and some people who like the current model.

No~one gets to decide which one you use but you. Just put a radial menu on the hybrid form feat, allowing for choice of appearance with identical stats.

Werewolves are shapeshifters. It makes perfect sense that the shapes they shift into could be variable.
*Love_on_a_Wire
Posts: 135
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Posted by *Love_on_a_Wire »


SyntheticRose,Dec 16 2016 wrote: Why is there no vote option for player's choice?
This.

I don't find the female werewolf model to be especially bothersome to look at, and we already have one person who made it clear they would be much more comfortable if it was an option. I don't think there's much of a downside in having another option for werewolves, and this way people who like the current model but play female characters aren't shoehorned into using it.
*Pink Panties
Posts: 23
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Posted by *Pink Panties »


I'm not saying we should give up the current one. I think we should have the option to have the female one if we so choose. Perhaps another option would be to "rebrand" it or make it less powerful than the current model. A cousin to the were's where the curse is less potent and leaving the person more humanoid?

As for the issues most people had with it, from what I read it was a matter of clipping with large weapons, and this still happens with the male model if I'm not mistaken.

Also still hopping for the werefox might be an option
*Rayanne
Posts: 191
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Posted by *Rayanne »


Couldn't you make a dialogue option, like selecting size for dragons, where you can pick between either of the two models?
*Jelkia
Posts: 71
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Posted by *Jelkia »


Ah think tha'd be tha best way ta go bout et. Shouldn be too hard yeh?
Post Reply